Opposing Digits:  The Jesuit Order

Home | Vlog | Forum | Contact

*this page will be a work in progress and feed off this forum thread.

The Jesuit Order - Why I don't Subscribe

The people I see pushing the 'Jesuit's Did It' notion, not only tend to  have far reaching evidence to support their theories; but they give little or no reason for exposing Jesuits over Zionists or world bankers. They appeal to people's urge to 'dig deeper' as if they're on to something even more sinister and secret. They often appear to have religious propaganda to mix in with some incredible story telling.

Zionism  is easy to understand, it's effects are visible, the evidence against it is plain to see; once you know what it is and how it works (through religion). Exposing Zionism, religion, world bankers, media induced stereotypes and behavior, and commercialism's control of the masses appears to me to be the most effective things we can expose to instill change and halt the genocide, rape and torture in Palestine and Iraq. The Jesuit Order propaganda appears to be a diversion from what is effective.

Are it's Advocates Credible?

After reading the Arctic Beacon by Greg Szymanski for a while, I started to feel like I was reading a tabloid.

 Arctic Beacon Bat Boy

The stories were just too incredible, and it boggled my mind how someone could produce such information so frequently. The reason I don't offer any evidence here is the same reason I give no evidence for the non-existence of the Easter Bunny or any other fairy tail. I'd just like the reader to think critically and decide for themselves.

Why would these people have us ignore the current genocide in Iraq and Palestine and possibly soon Iran)? Why would they bombard us with repetitive scare-mongering propaganda and not cover important current issues?

Now when debating a Zionist denying Jesuit Order proponent; I'm met with hostility, and false accusations (lies). I'm called an anti-Semite by many. Lets understand something here: 'Anti-Semite' is merely a smear term used by desperate people. Why don't they call me racist, anti-Israelite, anti-Khazar, or anti-Jew?

Many people aren't aware that Arabs tend to be more Semitic than Khazar occupied Palestine (Israelis not Israelites). The ancestors of most of these people adopted the sick religion. Most therefore (Khazars) have no Biblical claim to the land. The creation of Israel had a lot to do with lies surrounding the Holocaust. In order to suppress these lies; they've made it illegal to criticize the evidence of the holocaust in many countries. Have they done such a thing to protect the Jesuit Order? Are they not protecting the lies by smearing people with false accusations of being anti-semite?

As you can see: I'm not anti-Semite, I'm not even a racist. Also note that I am blaming religion. Why do they not use the term: "anti-Jew"? This is very easy to answer! Judaism is extremely racist, and Christianity is merely a denomination of Judaism. Jew isn't a legitimate race as there are Khazars and Sephardic Jews. In reality; there is only one race for us human! They also want us to believe that there are lost tribes (which is propaganda to manipulate us). Why do we have so many variations of Jesus? We don't even need to look at the Talmud for the proof of racism. The evidence is also in the Torah which comprises the first 5 books of the Christian Bible!

Are the everlasting covenants concerning the seed of Abraham or the law of circumcision or any racist laws nullified by the New Testament?

Jesus:

Matthew 5:17 17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

As you can see; the best way to smear people like me is to resort to a miss-understood, and miss-used term! This doesn't mean that there aren't many crypto-racist and openly racist Zionist so called truth tellers out there.

In a world full of dis-information; it's a good idea to familiarize yourselves with The Rules of Disinformation. They are in constant use by many online characters, and sometimes accidentally used. - Ask questions, demand answers! Recently I've confronted the Alex Jones crowd on their accusations of this page: Alex Jones Exposed! It's often accused of being full of lies. I ask for a single lie to be exposed. Here are some replies to my challenge (examples of disinfo):

"@opposingdigits.com

Your dumbass ugly page IS full of lies and ridiculus claims. Go and jump under a VW Microbus ya ridiculus fool. BTW, you're going down :) Have a nice drown!"

"First off your ignorance shows opposing,I feel for you and just like a struggling webmaster you use a mans page that is out here trying to make a difference for a place to plug your lame ass webpage. I challenge you to DIS prove anything on here and then you can continue to run your mouth. Have a bad day! Ignore these idiots that are probably hired just to discredit this page."
If the page is full of lies; and they were asked to provide proof of a single lie, why instead did they prefer to behave as such? If my pages are full of lies; they could easily discredit me, and that would be it.

I won't say at this time that the Jesuits are not in control, or that the Jesuit Order was not behind 911. I'm not really a Jesuit denier. It doesn't matter to me much if they are in control. I'm exposing their tools of control and what matters most. The rest seems like story telling that 'could' be true. If it's not: then it's still used as a diversion.