We are all Human. We may indeed be diverse, but we are all still part of the same Human family. The Zionists try to convince us that "race" exists so that they can install a hierarchical paradigm based on an ideology of racial supremacy. They also try to impose multi-culturalism (cultural assimilation) through colonialism, imperialism, ethnic "cleansing", and media propaganda in order to erode the very fabric of our Human diversity.
On another (but related note), the emergence of the feminist movement and the ubiquitous politically correct mass media propaganda promoting homosexuality are calculated attempts to obscure and erase the concept of the natural 2 genders from Human Consciousness.
I'm not homophobic, but I am convinced that homosexuality is in large part, a result of long-term generational conditioning due to the constant attack on the Human psyche by the Zionists who control those institutions of mass media, medicine, science, and so on and so forth. I'm also against Religious dogma which condemns / demonizes homosexuality, but I realize that that is a controlled opposition to help try to keep Anti-Religious dissenters like me from exposing homosexuality for what it is. It is highly imperative for us to think outside of these controlled oppositional paradigms.
Only when we can think outside of these paradigms, can we begin to see through the illusion of "race" and those other artificial social constructs which are designed to keep us distracted from our true state of Consciousness.
• noun 1 each of the major divisions of humankind, having distinct physical characteristics. 2 racial origin or distinction: rights based on race. 3 a group of people sharing the same culture, language, etc.; an ethnic group. 4 a group of people or things with a common feature. 5 Biology a distinct population within a species; a subspecies.
— USAGE Some people now feel that the word race should be avoided, because of its associations with the now discredited theories of 19th-century anthropologists and physiologists about supposed racial superiority. Terms such as people, community, or ethnic group are less emotionally charged.
From a biological context one should always take into account the genetic diversity one has inherited. However aside from that people should be judged on their actions and personality during their personal interactions. Though in the past your genetics determined what type of culture and pattern of thinking you may likely have this is no longer necessarily the case, especially in racially diverse societies.
To an extent multiculturalism has not been a bad thing as it gives more options in one's views of the world. However historically it has been imposed, as you mentioned, as oppose to letting it emerge voluntarily.
On Feminism:
I think the I agreed with the early feminists in empowering women's freedom as the constitution thumpers fail to realize at times. However the recent movement has become a bit of a joke as even Bill Maher has pointed out.
They tend to forget about most women's biological desire to have a family and take care of their children without having to worry if they need to go to work the next day to feed their child. Sadly many people can no longer depend on one provider and one caretaker but two providers and a nanny (if their lucky) or the prison camps called school.
On homosexuality:
I feel about this like I feel about race, rather apathetic. Why care unless its forced upon you like mentioned with the propaganda.
Quote:
I'm also against Religious dogma which condemns / demonizes homosexuality, but I realize that that is a controlled opposition to help try to keep Anti-Religious dissenters like me from exposing homosexuality for what it is.
What is homosexuality besides animals of the same sex that like to have intercourse with one another. A preference whether genetic or not.
That was a very dumb question that lady asked him imo.
It was stupid on purpose. Sometimes staged stupid questions have to be blatantly asked so that a designated point can be made in response. Plus the lady is cute, so she is automatically excused, imo.
Quote:
From a biological context one should always take into account the genetic diversity one has inherited. However aside from that people should be judged on their actions and personality during their personal interactions. Though in the past your genetics determined what type of culture and pattern of thinking you may likely have this is no longer necessarily the case, especially in racially diverse societies.
Race is still a concept which is divisive in its nature. If we can transcend this concept and just simplify it to accomodate the totality of humanity, we'd all be better off. Human beings are diverse. There is no debating that. However, we are all still human; plus there is probably a strong likelihood that we all originated from the same area of the world anyways (but that still remains a theory at this point). Humanity with less divisive concepts would actually be more compassionate towards its own diversity than if it remained attached to foolish concepts like racial pride, racial superiority, racial supremacy, chosenness, etc. (all of which can only exist because of the "race" concept). We must treat these things as concepts, because those are what they ultimately are.
If the "race" concept can be used to unite Humanity rather than divide it, I'll be willing to open up to it. So far, history has shown that said concept is in large part -- because of its nature -- a destructive one. We'd be better off not perceiving each other as "Black" or "White" or whatever race label we are socially conditioned with, in my opinion.
Quote:
To an extent multiculturalism has not been a bad thing as it gives more options in one's views of the world.
I wasn't talking about multiculturalism literally as it is. I was talking about the cultural assimilation agenda which is outwardly perceived as multiculturalism.
Quote:
However historically it has been imposed, as you mentioned, as oppose to letting it emerge voluntarily.
Not multiculturalism. Cultural assimilation. The two are different. However, one is being deliberately presented as the other, in the mainstream context.
Quote:
On Feminism:
I think the I agreed with the early feminists in empowering women's freedom as the constitution thumpers fail to realize at times.
I wouldn't call fighting for women's rights "feminist" movements. Women have the natural right to be free and equal, period. So by default, the fight for women's rights is necessary. The problem starts when the cause falls under the label "feminist" which diverts from the intention to honor the humanity in women. Feminism (a diversion from the underlying reason for women's rights -- human rights) is divisive for it seeks to "empower" the female gender in order to exploit it. Let's also keep in mind that there is a strong chance, that behind the feminist movement, is the Rockefeller / CFR branch:
Why care unless its forced upon you like mentioned with the propaganda.
It's being propagated and is an aspect of the cultural assimilation agenda.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm also against Religious dogma which condemns / demonizes homosexuality, but I realize that that is a controlled opposition to help try to keep Anti-Religious dissenters like me from exposing homosexuality for what it is.
What is homosexuality besides animals of the same sex that like to have intercourse with one another. A preference whether genetic or not.
Homosexuality is none of my business. A life is a life. Every life is equally as valuable. There is actually nothing wrong with homosexuals and their natural and / or conditioned preferences (especially when it pertains to hot lesbians, in my biased opinion of course ). That being said, I sometimes cannot help but hold a subconscious negative view towards gay men. But then again, that is just an error in my judgment and personality. If I offended anyone, I apologize. Regards.
...the very concept of race is bogus and has no basis in biology, according to most scientists.
``This dialogue on race is driving me up the wall,'' said Jefferson Fish, a psychologist at St. John's University in New York who has written extensively about race in America. ``Nobody is asking the question, `What is race?' It is a biologically meaningless category. It is a cultural term that Americans use to describe what a person's ancestry is.
``But biologically the human species does not have categories. It just has variations as one travels around the world.''...
...``The concept of race is a social and cultural construction. . . . Race simply cannot be tested or proven scientifically,'' according to a policy statement by the American Anthropological Association. ``It is clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. The concept of `race' has no validity . . . in the human species.''...
...``Teaching that racial categories lack biological validity can be as much of a challenge as teaching in the 17th century that the Earth goes around the sun,'' said Marks.
I wouldn't be surprised that we are all related and originally came from a single source. We are one big family come to think of it. That being said, we must also watch out for those planted misinfo agents who will use this solid scientific argument as credence for religious storylines pertaining to Adam and Eve depicted in the bible and other scripts.
When some people use the "race" they attach a biological meaning, still others use "race" as a socially constructed concept. It is clear that even though race does not have a biological meaning, it does have a social meaning which has been legally constructed...
...There are no genetic characteristics possessed by all Blacks but not by non- Blacks; similarly, there is no gene or cluster of genes common to all Whites but not to non-Whites. One's race is not determined by a single gene or gene cluster, as is, for example, sickle cell anemia. Nor are races marked by important differences in gene frequencies, the rates of appearance of certain gene types. The data compiled by various scientists demonstrates, contrary to popular opinion, that intra-group differences exceed inter-group differences. That is, greater genetic variation exists within the populations typically labeled Black and White than between these populations. This finding refutes the supposition that racial divisions reflect fundamental genetic differences...
