Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
As soon as I brought up Zionism to Rex; he stopped communications. Then I see him trying to appeal to the youths, and in the same video driving while recording a session. -Good influence!
Some people remain ignorant of their histories and want to move on to change. I do have to give him credit for trying to take action as oppose to just talking the talk.
Agreed. I haven't watched TV since about 1990 or so. In the rare event that I agree to watch something on TV with someone, I find myself annoyed and disgusted. I can see the lies and misdirection so easily now that it is like torture to watch it.
I point out the obvious tricks to others, but for the most part they either don't get it or don't care.
Tue May 22, 2007 5:57 am
Sponsor
false flag VIP
Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 445 Location: melbourne, Australia
Truthseeker wrote:
Quote from postcardsfrompalestine:
Quote:
throw away your tv's
Agreed. I haven't watched TV since about 1990 or so. In the rare event that I agree to watch something on TV with someone, I find myself annoyed and disgusted. I can see the lies and misdirection so easily now that it is like torture to watch it.
I point out the obvious tricks to others, but for the most part they either don't get it or don't care.
I agree 100% with you! Watching any tv now makes me develop a severe case of pissed off rage. And I feel like I want to throw a brck through the screen. I find myself yelling at the zog-box because the idiotic banter and lies makes me wonder how there can be so many braindead zombies, who actually watch the shite on tv and then think that they have been "informed" and "educated" by listening to lies and disinformation. I do all my entertainment on my computer (3D modelling and graphics work, oh and the odd game!) and by reading a good book. Tv is for morons.
Tue May 22, 2007 3:36 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Agreed. I haven't watched TV since about 1990 or so. In the rare event that I agree to watch something on TV with someone, I find myself annoyed and disgusted. I can see the lies and misdirection so easily now that it is like torture to watch it.
I point out the obvious tricks to others, but for the most part they either don't get it or don't care.
I agree 100% with you! Watching any tv now makes me develop a severe case of pissed off rage. And I feel like I want to throw a brck through the screen. I find myself yelling at the zog-box because the idiotic banter and lies makes me wonder how there can be so many braindead zombies, who actually watch the shite on tv and then think that they have been "informed" and "educated" by listening to lies and disinformation. I do all my entertainment on my computer (3D modelling and graphics work, oh and the odd game!) and by reading a good book. Tv is for morons.
My mate has a poster from the film Trainspotting that reads
Quote:
Choose life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a f*cking big television. Choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose a three-piece suite on hire purchase in a range of f*cking fabrics. Choose DIY and wondering who the sexual intercourse you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing f*cking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, f*cked up brats you spawned to replace you. Choose your future. Choose life.
This explains a lot of why people sit down and take this shit. The main thing that makes me care is ANGER, which is something others they lack because they are constantly satiated by the aforementioned things. Sure you can argue that the way to fight it is through love and friendship as Mystica said but if you think you can be truly happy with the way things are then you are deluded. Is love the answer or is that the same tactics religion uses to keep you from actually doing anything?
Quote:
Demand the dissemination of truth and fairness in the media, for the dismantling of media monopolies into more 'diverse' and genuine publications with freedom of speech ... demand fredom of speech AND THOUGHTS in any form, spoken, read, or written.
Demand the removal of overt advertising that turns our young and innocent into addicts ... ie sex, drugs and unsuitable activities and behaviour.
Demand the legalisation of NATURAL, unadulterated and unmixed marijuana, for the right to grow your own, and end the poliferation of man-made, and deadly substances that increases addictions, increases crime and destroys families.
Demand that drug addicts be able to safely and legally register with a qualified medical pracitioner and obtain the CORRECT quality and quantity of heroin and other subatances in order "To maintain a NORMAL lifestyle". DEMAND that suppliers and pushers of drugs are no longer able to make unimaginable profits, by providing the legal means for addicts AND recreational users to SAFE access to safe substances.
Demand ENORMOUS fines for Suppliers and pushers (including those from the legal and political systems) and end the prosecution of users.
Stop patronising SUPERmarkets, or buying adulterated foods and unnecessarily packaged food, demand loose products instead. Practice NATURAL medicine and demand the supply of the natural herbs restricted by the FDA and TGA (Australia).
And above all demand the proper education for our children in spirituality and ethical behaviour and NOT religion, make religion open to 'ADULTS ONLY', demand schools teach reading writing and Arithmetic ONLY, for primary school students, and expand on those subjects as required on an individual basis. Encourage students to follow their interests through these tools, to learn at their own pace, but still encouraging and stimulating their interests with interesting and FUN facts. Turn learning into fun and children will embrace education and thrive, remove the grind and turn learning into play and see the transformation in slow learners. Dispense with EXAMINATIONS and have regular 'competitions' instead and graded to a childs needs.
How are we to demand when we have nothing!? We can demand all we want we're not gonna get jackshit unless we take it.
Sat Aug 04, 2007 7:44 pm
Sponsor
alexclaton VIP
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 688 Location: Hell on earth
if we take out the media and tv in general and then electricity the idiots will tear the country a new asshole simply cuz they have nothing better to do.... dont believe me? look what happens when there a black out for more then 10 hours in san francisco, new york or los angelas.... fvckers are tearin the streets up like theres no tomorrow.... good way to bring the system to a halt if u ask me....
Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:51 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 688 Location: Hell on earth
that video is old but still valid none the less... it begs the question... when ARE we gonna fight back?
if they grab on guy the ppl behind him should attack the cops that are trying to arrest/detain the first guy... and keep on doing that like a wave ... the ppl greatly out number the cops and sho8uldnt have a problem putting them in their place... when the police break the law and attack innocent ppl they are no longer police and are fair game... ppl need to fight back or theyll just back u into a corner then jam their fist up ur ass just to let u know whos in charge... are u gonna take it?
You were given the right to bear arms BY the people who set out to control your minds, it's the right to bear arms that makes you think it's ok to use them on your own people who have a different idea of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ...
Sorry, I know Mystica's post is old and barely on-topic at this point, but I must have missed this point in my first pass.
Correction: According to the founding fathers of the united States of America, we were given our rights by our creator (whatever we believe that to be). (If you don't beleive in a creator, then the Declaration of Independance might cause a bit of a problem for you. No creator, no Rights?) We did not get our Rights from any government, or Constitution, or any human being. We (humans with Rights) created the the State governments and the Federal Government, all of which (as fictional entities) cannot give or take away Rights. We give "permissions" to the fictional entities (governments) and all those who occupy their offices.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
The Bill of Rights further defined these rights for the Constitution contract.
"The Right to Bear Arms" was specifically "realized" to prevent a tryannical government from overthrowing the people. (I say "realized" as opposed to "intended", for according to the founding fathers, no man "intended" our Rights, they were "endowed by their Creator".)
Armies were not created to protect the people from the government.
Yes, I agree with the first part. Militias comprised of armed civilians, acting on their own authority, would protect the people from military action of the government.
About the second part; Congress was given the permission from the people to create an army for the defense of the country. (Not to invade other countries!) Therefore we can see that the purpose of the Army, being controlled by the Federal Government, is to defend the country from foreign invaders. Stopping at that, it would seem that you are correct. But perhaps there is more to it...let's look at the oath that is taken when joining the US Army.
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
Quote:
"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic,
1 : an established law or custom : ORDINANCE
2 a : the physical makeup of the individual especially with respect to the health, strength, and appearance of the body <a hearty constitution> b : the structure, composition, physical makeup, or nature of something <the constitution of society>
3 : the act of establishing, making, or setting up
4 : the mode in which a state or society is organized; especially : the manner in which sovereign power is distributed
5 a : the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or social group that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the people in it b : a written instrument embodying the rules of a political or social organization
We see in those definitions that "constitution" in the oath can mean (in order of above):
1. The laws and customs of the united States
2. The physical united States (land)
3.
4. The organization of the united States (the Constitutions of the States and Federal Government)
5a. The principles and laws of the united States
5b. The Constitution of the united States document itself
Since the oath is not specific, it can mean one or all of these meanings. (A presumption in law.) #4 indicates that the US Army will defend the Rights of the people and the restrictions on the Governments. (#5a is not possible, due to the Posse Comitatus Act.) So it appears that the US Army has the ability to defend the people from the government, but "will they?" is another question. Most of them probably don't understand the oath they have taken, or remember that they took it at all. But I guess it would suffice to say that "they aren't", regardless of whether they can. What Ed Brown says about police can apply to the US Army also, they are all just mercenaries working for their pay.
The constitution ha been revoked
they now have the right to search and siezure without just cause can enter your house without warrant can use the military to patrol the streets
spy on you , waire tap you,etc.. and now this the 2nd amendment is being dismantled
http://www.newswithviews.com/Pratt/larry81.htm
what does all this mean?
Well it means that America will have the Canadian Constitution instead of it's own.
it ultimately means that Americans are like grade school children who can not get over racial problems, economic problems, etc...
It means that America is broken and will be taken away from you ,you can not manage your part of the world.
dont expect any of the changes to the constitution to be a temporary state of affairs ,these are permanent.
you see in the NAU it wont be America in control, America was never in control to begin with.
they will use the canadian law of the land ,because Canada is not a country.
it is an extension of England.
All of Canada's elected officials, police,army etc.. all swear allegiance to the throne of England when entering office .
just as with all of AMerica's presidents were/are related to the throne by blood , the very few that were not ,played by a script or were shot.
Indeed if the American people understood what the bush family has done to them they would indeed run them down the streets and kill them.
Today the American armed forces are in foriegn lands soon it will be clear to all that this force is utterly broken
this so that blackwater brigades made up of foriegners will be used to quell the coming riots, they have no quams about killing Americans ,in fact many relish the thought of it.
the day of the locusts fast approaches while most Americans sleep walk into the mouth of the beast
I was unaware of this. Can you please provide references? Or at least explain what you mean?
It is my understanding that:
1. Any laws or acts, when not in accord with the Constitution, are unconstitutional.
2. Any laws or acts that are unconstitutional are null and void (unenforcable).
3. We can choose to obey or not obey, resist or not resist, any unconstitutional law or act if we want to.
I do not see proof that the Constitution is revoked/void/broken. I see proof that the current "government" is acting unconstitutionally and we are letting them get away with it.
Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:04 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
1,000 Attempt Citizen's Arrest Of Bush
09-27-2007
Thought Criminal
As George Bush made his appearance and speech today at the United Nations in NYC, 1,000 people issued a citizen's arrest warrant against him for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The day began with twelve separate feeder marches converging from across the city, consisting of perhaps several hundred protesters. The people carried 20 large coffins with them and marched from all five boroughs toward Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza and the UN Building where Bush was speaking. The feeder marches were organized by Arrest Cheney First, the War Resister's League, Witness Against Torture, Movement for a Democratic Society (MDS-NYC) and others.
1,000 Attempt Citizen's Arrest of Bush at UN; Blocked by Police, 10 to 12 Arrests
A citizen's arrest warrant has been issued! Please do your duty and see that it is served!
As George Bush made his appearance and speech today at the United Nations in NYC, 1,000 people issued a citizen's arrest warrant against him for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The day began with twelve separate feeder marches converging from across the city, consisting of perhaps several hundred protesters. The people carried 20 large coffins with them and marched from all five boroughs toward Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza and the UN Building where Bush was speaking. The feeder marches were organized by Arrest Cheney First, the War Resister's League, Witness Against Torture, Movement for a Democratic Society (MDS-NYC) and others.
Police had already set up a protest pen outside of the UN for a rally called by the vanguardist World Can't Wait, and quickly moved to herd the marchers into the pens. When members of the War Resister's League exited the pen to deliver the arrest warrant, police arrested 8 of them and grabbed three or four unaffiliated protesters from the pen as well, at approximately 10:30 am.
Eventually, the original contingent of marchers and several hundred others got tired of the pens and began to march south on Second Avenue toward Washington Square Park. A few attempts were made to march in the street, but police reacted violently, shoving and pushing marchers back onto the sidewalk. In the process, police also seized any megaphones they saw. Several protesters sustained injuries in these encounters, but no arrests were made. In all, about 500 people made their way to Washington Square Park.
The idea of citizen's arrest has its roots in common law, and allows for any citizen to execute an arrest on someone who they witness committing a felony offense. All states in the United States allow for citizen's arrest, except for North Carolina, which follows different statutes. Those undertaking a citizen's arrest can still be held liable in civil or criminal court for any damages they inflict in the process. However, they have full rights to detain and arrest a suspect who they witness in commission of a felony.
Applicable felonies in this case include, but are not limited to: treason, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, perjury, conspiracy malfeasance in office, fraud, embezzlement, and kidnapping.
Under established international and military law, also, the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity, for which, as commander in chief, Bush bears command responsibility for the actions of those under his command as well as for his own policies.
Under the principles of the Nuremburg Trials at the end of World War Two, Bush would be indictable for all four counts established back then:
1. Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of crime against peace;
2. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace;
3. War crimes;
4. Crimes against humanity.
While the efforts of citizens today to serve an arrest warrant on Bush failed, be advised: the warrant stands. Please do you duty, and try at every opportunity to bring this criminal to justice.
