Theories That Distract From Reality

Posts: 237

Tektites (I'm sure most of you have not heard of them until this thread) are a complete mystery to scientists everywhere.

Quote:

Tektites are one of the most mysterious and most hotly-debated rock types on earth. Their origin remains an unsolved mystery after several hundred years of scientific research. Tektites exhibit a number of meteoritic features, including ablation and atmospheric melting, flight orientation, distribution on a certain strewn field, sharp difference from native rocks, so on. However, they don't have cosmic ray tracks and Al - Nd isotopic characteristics of a long period of time in outer space. Dr. J. D. O'Keefe, Dr. D. R. Chapman of NASA and other scientists have found more and more solid evidences showing the lunar origin of tektites. Meanwhile, other researchers find some evidences unfavorable to the theory that tektites are from the Moon. It is time for more people to try to solve this scientific riddle.

There are 2 lines of thought.
1) Lunar origin and/or extra-terrestrial.
2) Terrestrial.

Both answers have numerous holes in their explanation. Tektites have no cosmic ray exposure, so the extra-terrestrail nature would have to be eliminated. They also are not completely similar to obsidian glass underneath the ground. Plus the non-presence of impact crators in strewnfields where tektites are found, lead scientists to believe the farse that the crators are hundreds of miles away from the splashed tektites. Most meteroties are generally lukewarm and/or cold when they hit ground, so how can one generate enough heat and force to penetrate deep enough into the ground to liquefy and catapalt glass hundreds of miles away? Not very likely.

So they debate will continue, unless one can easily conclude that there is a glass ceiling 70 miles up in the air....

This is my theory...

And considering there are no impact crators in strewnfields where tektites are found, this comet origin theory applies:

Posts: 237

If you accept the idea of a real glass ceiling, you can easily explain the Auroras....

Posts: 819

hi - i'm jason k. freecat and this guy escaped.. he kept harrassing the other patients with his glass theory and causing all kinds of psychoses.

after a confrontation with a hollow earth fanatic he knocked out the guard, stole a car and disappeared.

it was only a matter of time he got back onto the internet.. dammit.

come back, dave.. you've been off your medication almost three weeks now.

Posts: 237

	stOneskull wrote:
	hi - i'm jason k. freecat and this guy escaped.. he kept harrassing the other patients with his glass theory and causing all kinds of psychoses. after a confrontation with a hollow earth fanatic he knocked out the guard, stole a car and disappeared. it was only a matter of time he got back onto the internet.. dammit. come back, dave.. you've been off your medication almost three weeks now.

Just trying to reverse the damage.

Posts: 419

All scientific theories contain within themselves their own falsifiability. So, Cyrus...tell us. What proof would you accept that your theory is false? What would it take to get you to ditch this ridiculous idea? Or is your ego already too attached to it to consider that possibility?

Posts: 237

	Aeon wrote:
	All scientific theories contain within themselves their own falsifiability. So, Cyrus...tell us. What proof would you accept that your theory is false? What would it take to get you to ditch this ridiculous idea? Or is your ego already too attached to it to consider that possibility?

I dunno.

How about ditch all the tektites and meteorites with fusion crust into the sea.

And then pretend they never existed, and if any fall down in the future....hide them.

But that would only get me to cry foul.

So I guess I'm pretty stuck on the fact that there is glass up in the sky.....sorry.

Posts: 819

if you want a drink of water and reach into the cupboard for a glass..
when you grab the glass you think 'omg how did this glass get here?'
as in for some reason you happen to be ignorant on how glass is made.

you could theorise on how the glass came to be, or you could learn how the glass came to be.

then on learning what glass is and how it is made.. you realise that it was made.

why not say there is sand in the sky? or quartz or whatever?
that when heated turns to glass.
or why not think that the meteorite has some sort of rock that can turn into glass when heated?

why go with such a bizarre theory that is not evident?

i think you aren't serious at all.

Posts: 445

This theory is about as shallow as the "hollow earth" theory and the "reptillian alien agenda" theory. This is the stuff that makes normal people think that anybody who dissects current events for the underlying reasons and means for it taking place. Is a tin-foil hat wearing, UFO worshipping kook or nutjob.
I have been called all these just for speaking the truth about 9/11, an event that was clearly orchestrated by those who dominate the planet (zionists) so it could be blamed on muslims so a war could be started.

Yet here you are saying there is "Glass" in the sky Rolling Eyes

which would have to be one of the silliest theories I have ever heard. I'm sure as kids we all played around with shining the suns rays through a shard of glass or a magnifying glass. A hot bright spot of light would form and quickly heat up and ignite the paper, wood, ants etc that you were focusing on.
So one ponders the thought if the world was truly (by some miracle!) encased in glass then surely the sun shining through it would be focused intensely at certain points (much like a magnifying glass, glass shard or even a bottle) causing intensely hot fires???

And I always thought glass was a product of melted silica (sand)...silly me Razz

Posts: 237

It's funny. No one bothers to refute the evidence. Just call the idea preposterous.

Good job boys.

Posts: 237

............and the city [was] pure gold, like unto clear glass.

.......and the street of the city [was] pure gold, as it were transparent glass.

Posts: 419

	Cyrus the Shepherd wrote:
	It's funny. No one bothers to refute the evidence. Just call the idea preposterous. Good job boys.

Since you most definitely have the cart before the horse on this, it is, by definition, PRE-POSTEROUS.

Posts: 237

	Aeon wrote:
	Since you most definitely have the cart before the horse on this, it is, by definition, PRE-POSTEROUS.

Elihu believed there was glass in the sky.
"Hast thou with himspread out the sky, which is strong, as a molten looking glass?" Job 37:18

Did he have to see a meteorite with fusion crust, or a tektite to believe there was glass in the sky?

He probably just saw a rainbow, and concluded, "Ah, there's glass in the sky."

He probably didn't know about short-wave radio signals, or how auroras act the same way as electrons hitting glass tubes.

He had the advantage of not watching the Zionist-controlled media and the Zionist-controlled space programs. Lucky him.

Those who promote the idea that the world is spinning in a Copernican universe are the ones who diametrically oppose the physical existence of God in the heart of our inverted earth.

They promote the fantasies of space travel and the possibilites of visiting other planets and galaxies. This is partly why they created the moon hoax, to foster the idea of man to travel to distant worlds.

But in reality, you have been duped. So much so that you still believe their lies.

Even a elementary school child can conclude there is glass in the sky, just by looking at a rainbow and understanding how prisms work.

Why can't you?

Ever since kindergarten we have been deprogrammed.

The Space Shuttle needs dichroic glass coated tiles to enter and exit the atmosphere. This is called "frit". Dichroic glass is glass that has a higher melting point than regular glass. Combined with the foam underneath this glass top coating, it keeps the high temperature to the outer layer and the low heat foam prevents the heat from extending to the space craft. The friction exchange between the frit and the glass in the sky creates enough heat to melt and liquify the glass. Then the shuttle is allow to penetrate. This is why ALL spacecraft leaving the atmosphere need a heat sheild. Heat shields are on long-range nuclear warheads, rockets that carry satellites, moon orbiters, anything that goes past the glass.

The Virgin Glactic "spaceship" does not have a heat shield. This is because it never leaves the atmosphere. It only goes about 60 miles high. It has been exposed as a fraud because I've shown how it uses wide angle lenses to "prove" the curvature of the earth.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3823&start=0

If what NASA says about going REALLY fast through air produces extreme heat, then why is there little protection from this heat in this craft?
Why are the windows circular? Is this because they can easily convert them into wide angle lenses?

We all have been made fools of. They lied to us all. There is most definitely glass in the sky. Glass is the simplist answer to all the mysteries that science cannot figure out like - the origin of tektites, and fusion crust formation, and the reason for a comet's curved separated tail, and radio wave refraction, and auroras.

Why is it so hard for you to believe? There is ACTUAL evidence. There is proof beyond doubt.

I think it is because people's hearts are bad.

In Jeremiah 5:21-22, JHVH uses a riddle to hide the glass in the sky from those whose hearts were rebellious.

"Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:

Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand [for] the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?

How can the sand from the coasts prevent waves from passing? Tsunamis and hurricanes pass over the sand very easily...

No, think harder, there is a sand up in the sky. It's a molten sand. It prevents the water from flooding the continents. It was placed there after the Flood.....

"I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth." Genesis 9:13

God promised Noah that the earth would not flood again by putting a glass ceiling in the sky to compress the air and push down the water.
The "token" in this verse is a scientific token....the rainbow, a natural result of glass dividing the sunlight.

"Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth." Psalm 104:9

"For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known." 1Cor 13:12

I challenge you to face your fears, about the reality of there being a real God up there, who's only about 4,000 miles away.
It's not because there is no evidence for glass up in the sky, it's more because you have been told what to believe, and because we all have a sinful nature, we do not want to believe in the existence of God. We would rather believe a lie. This is how our hearts fool us. Don't be upset with me. Just try to be objective.

Erase all of your programmed understanding of the universe.

Get to the core of your heart.

Be honest with yourself.

For the love of God.

Posts: 237

All these vehicles, unlike conventional aircraft, have smooth-surface bottoms.

They are made like this ONLY to skid across glass.

Posts: 8246

	Cyrus the Shepherd wrote:
	For the love of God.

Your god condones sex slavery, racial genocide, and the bastard is responsible for butchering my penis. The only way this fictitious god is able to do such things is because people are brainwashed into believing in him!

video:
Mind Control Made Easy: How to Become a Cult Leader

Posts: 419

	Cyrus the Shepherd wrote:
	Even a (sic) elementary school child can conclude there is glass in the sky, just by looking at a rainbow and understanding how prisms work.

That same elementary school child may also conclude that a fork actually bends when it is placed into a glass of water. Grow up.