tiptoe, by your reasoning michael richards can't be jewish.
because if he was he would only be POSING as jewish.. not really jewish.. POSING.
and he isn't even posing as a jew.
and who are the ones posing, you say.. the elite zionists..
so what you're saying is michael richards is an elite zionist, not a jew.
That's my point. He is not Jewish, but probably a Zionist Jew (or to make it clear to you, what I mean by this is, a Zionist posing as a Jew ---> that's what I mean by the term Zionist Jew).
Dude, stop being picky with semantics. You know very well what I mean. I know he is not a Jew. What I meant was, he could be a Zionist posing as a Jew. I just happened to use the term Zionist Jew to make my point quickly. When I mean Zionist Jew, I actually mean a Zionist posing as a Jew. Not a Jew literally.
Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:16 pm
Sponsor
stOneskull
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 819 Location: Australia
and again he isn't posing as a jew..
where do you get that from?
if anything he is posing as a catholic.
Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:18 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Can't we just simply get some documentation on Klu Klux Kramer?
I never said he is posing as a Jew. I just said he could be. Why is that? Because based on the research of Tsarion and Maxwell (which you are proving to me you know very little about), they detail the fact that HIGH-LEVEL FREEMASONS are connected to Zionists, Catholics, and other facets of the Illuminati. Their research is irrefutable.
In one episode, Michael Richards as Kramer (the real Kramer upon whom the character is based is Jewish and an old neighbor of "Seinfeld" co-creator Larry David) plans a Jewish singles function with authentic ethnic foods. He wants Jerry and Elaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus) to attend, and Elaine says, "Well, I'm not Jewish!" To which Kramer replies, "Neither am I."
In the same show, Kramer holds the function at the Knights of Columbus Hall, courtesy of George's dad's membership. Knights of Columbus is a Catholic organization.
From the same site:
Quote:
Then there's "Seinfeld." Everybody knows Jerry Seinfeld is Jewish - on the tube and off. But what about the rest of the gang - Kramer, Elaine and George?
No, no and no - and no to George's parents, as well.
And here I was under the impression that Seinfeld would only work with Jews, and possibly liked Superman for his Jewish origin.
He could be posing as either a Catholic or a Jew or any other facet of the Illuminati (because the Illuminati is like a doll within a doll within a doll). One thing we know for sure, he is a high-level Freemason. It is through the research of Tsarion and Maxwell that you will clearly understand the connections between Zionism (Fake Judaism) and Jesuitism (Fake Christianity), as well as the roots of religion (which are all fake anyways). Everything in the Illuminati Hierarchy is based on fakery and lies, and that's how the world is controlled.
Though I don't have any solid proof that he is Jewish or Catholic , I do have solid proof (sources above) that he is Illuminati, because High-Level Freemasonry is deeply connected to Zionism and Jesuitism on the highest levels, and all 3 are very significant elements of the Illuminati Pyramidal Hierarchy. These elements Zionism and Jesuitism (including Freemasonry -- which connects them both on the highest levels) can be traced back to Egyptian Atonism (Sun Worship), which goes even further back to Babylonian, Sumerian Sun Worship. And it is because of this solid evidence of his High-level ranking in Freemasonry http://www.srmason-sj.org/council/journal/sep00/marsellos.html that proves that he can only be a poser to either Judaism or Christianity. But on the larger picture, it really doesn't matter, because both Christianity and Judaism are all rehashments of older ancient religions, which themselves, are all fake as well.
Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:31 pm
stOneskull
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 819 Location: Australia
Quote:
I never said he is posing as a Jew. I just said he could be.
to whom? where? give me an example where he is..
anyway... is this right?..
There are 2 types of Catholic:
1.) the ordinary priest and / or practitioner of Catholicism
2.) the elite Zionists who pose as followers of Catholicism
again, why not skip the middlemen, jews and catholics, and just say michael richards is an elite zionist.
and ok, you say all 33rd degree masons are part of the illuminati or elite zionists.
and yeah, even though he may not belong to the kkk, he has probably read the work of albert pike, whom washington d.c. has a nice big statue to.
now... was the outburst on stage a part of the plan?
perhaps to help enable 'hate crime' laws in the u.s. or was it just personal rage that flew out?
Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:52 pm
Sponsor
stOneskull
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 819 Location: Australia
A recent theory is that the Bible is the history of Egypt, specifically of the Pharoahs.
Placing the characters of the Bible in the context of recorded history, there are many convincing links, where-as traditional beliefs don't gel with recorded history.
This includes characters such as Abraham, King Solomon and Moses.
The placing of the Bible in Egypt and linking the story to the history of Egypt, Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten is found to be Moses, and that his god Aton, is the Hebrew god Adon. [2][3]
I wrote that. and the bit in vocalisation.. and the two sources, one of which is tsarion's site..
last time i spoke to michael he thanked me for that and for letting him know of the fact that anyone could edit wikipedia.. which he wasn't aware of.
Last edited by stOneskull on Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 819 Location: Australia
mr jewwatch doesn't have a source.. but richards's name is clickable. it goes to wikipedia.
it's funny how the wikipedia entry sites a source for him being catholic that says wikipedia doesn't say his religion.
fun little wheel.
Wed Nov 22, 2006 8:54 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Dammit! Lets just blame mainstream media for not bringing up the all important question (as if i really care )!
Last edited by madthumbs on Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:04 am; edited 1 time in total
Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:09 pm
stOneskull
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 819 Location: Australia
it seems he was brought up catholic and went mason.
personally i think he got the 33 for being kramer.
to go from 32 to 33 you have to do some kind of service for humanity.. sort of like being knighted.
and i have read that not all 33rds join the 'dark side'.
who knows?
i bet letterman himself is a 33 mason.. is kramer trying to convey the masonic distress sign?
is he confused over writings? did he not study his lessons properly? did he get an easy ride through the degrees because he's kramer?
is he lost in albert pike writings? is he blackmailed in some way? was the comedy show an act or a real frustration over hecklers?
what was with the 'forcefield' and talking of a black/white conflict? the waving with his right-hand then his left-hand?
his comment of the rage of america vs another nation is interesting..
perhaps he really doesn't have what it takes to be evil.. hence the 'confronting himself'?