Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index
RegisterSearchFAQMemberlistUsergroupsVlogHomeLog in
The United States is a juristic person

 
Reply to topic    Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index » Big Brother and Law
The United States is a juristic person
Author Message
postcardsfrompalestine
VIP


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 1737
Location: It means good luck - a chinese symbol

Post The United States is a juristic person Reply with quote
UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION

The United States is a juristic person in the sense that it has capacity to sue upon contracts made with it or in vindication of its property rights.

juristic person
Alternative term for juridical person.

juridical person
Definition

Entity (such as a firm) other than a natural person (human being) created by law and recognized as a legal entity having distinct identity, legal personality, and duties and rights. Also called artificial person, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person. See also body corporate.

juridical person is in the Corporate, Commercial, & General Law subject.

juridical person appears in the definitions of the following terms: legal capacity, juristic person, juridical entity, person, legal person and natural person
Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:05 pm
Sponsor
Truthseeker
VIP


Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 506

Post Reply with quote
Quote:
The United States is a juristic person in the sense that it has capacity to sue upon contracts made with it or in vindication of its property rights.

Yup, the key word being, "contracts". However, I disagree with the definition's indication that the government has any "property rights". What property rights, or any rights at all, could the government have? Let's take a look at the chain of creation, but in a different way:

creator--(rights)-->human--(permissions)-->government
The creator gave us rights (or we realized that we have them), and we give the government permissions.

So what "property rights" could the government possibly have? They have our "property permission"!
How can a fictional thing have a "right" to any property, let alone interact with it? The concept is ludicrous. And lastly, we created the government to help us manage the lands of the uS, not have any title or "rights" to any of it.
Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:53 am
postcardsfrompalestine
VIP


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 1737
Location: It means good luck - a chinese symbol

Post yep Reply with quote
That was a court quote, but I don't know how any factitious could have a right to anything, other then be used as a character in the next Dan Brown novel.
Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:35 pm
Sponsor
Display posts from previous:    
Reply to topic    Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index » Big Brother and Law All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

AcidTechEX Design by Freestyle XL



 
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP